vote for NAP with -oRa- wing AHC

vote here for the NAP. Voting will be open for 3 days

Nap's are lame in my opinion, if they are going to leave their stuff sitting, and I can't hit it, because of some agreement, like hell I'm gonna let it sit and let someone else make profit. Yea stuff happens, but profit is profit, and this is a war game, not a crumpet and tea sit together.

Agreed

I lmao at the tea and crumpets. . .

Wings are full of noobs, noobs leave lots of small fleet lying around and make easy farms. I'm voting no, and if -oRa- has a problem with it just means more targets for us no?

I'm going to say yes, only on condition of a full alliance with -oRa-. If they aren't willing to begin actively helping then no way in hell. I'm saying this only because while so many say they can't play.. its always handy to have higher end players with fleets you can call up and use to help hit bigger targets. Also helps to have extra trade partners. But again, I think we should get something in return for taking 23 players, which is essentially 175 planets.. off the possible hit list.

They actually have 26 members, and -oRa- has 8, so that's 34 players that are untouchable. a NAP is like if we just took them all into our alliance, but they're the inactive noobs who don't participate or do anything to help with the growth of ALL the alliances. But like everyone has said in the circulars, if Deadmanwalking as well as his alliance mates are that shady than maybe we shouldn't be napped with them at all, if we call them cause we need help and they're like "oh... we can't help you" then what's the point in that?

Oh I'm with you, and that many targets.. does seem alot to give up. Demand tribute from them!

Lol tribute. Cool so we will all potentially get banned for pushing? I'm not really fussed to be completely honest im a miner. But i will fleet soon enough once i have 10-11 colonies up and running. and in general i hate NAP's. Unless the other alliance is liable to turn you to dust theres no point in having one.